chmProcessor vs Other CHM Tools: Features and Performance ComparisonMicrosoft Compiled HTML Help (CHM) remains a common format for offline documentation and help systems. Developers and documentation teams often need tools to create, extract, convert, and analyze CHM files. This article compares chmProcessor — a modern CHM handling tool — with other popular CHM utilities, examining features, performance, usability, extensibility, and real-world suitability.
Overview of CHM tools landscape
CHM tooling ranges from legacy Windows utilities to cross-platform command-line programs and libraries. Common tasks include:
- Creating CHM from HTML sources (projects, single-file documentation).
- Extracting HTML, images, and resources from CHM archives.
- Converting CHM to other formats (PDF, EPUB, Markdown).
- Searching and indexing content.
- Automating batch processing in CI/CD.
Popular tools considered here:
- chmProcessor (the subject)
- Microsoft HTML Help Workshop (hhw)
- 7-Zip (for extraction)
- chmlib / extract_chmLib (library and tools)
- Calibre (conversion-focused)
- CHM Decoder / various GUI extractors
Key comparison criteria
We compare tools on:
- Feature breadth (create, extract, convert, index)
- Performance (speed for common tasks)
- Accuracy and completeness (fidelity of converted content)
- Platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
- Automation and scripting (CLI, API, libraries)
- Ease of use (GUI, documentation)
- Extensibility and integrations (plugins, hooks)
- Licensing and maintenance (open-source, active development)
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Feature / Tool | chmProcessor | HTML Help Workshop | 7-Zip | chmlib / extract_chmLib | Calibre | CHM Decoders / GUI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Create CHM | Yes — project-driven, template support | Yes — original Microsoft tool | No | No (library can be used in tools) | No | Usually No |
| Extract CHM | Yes — full extraction with metadata | Limited | Yes — archive extraction | Yes — focused extraction | Yes (via import) | Yes |
| Convert to PDF/EPUB/MD | Built-in converters and plugins | No | No | No | Yes — strong conversion | Some provide conversion |
| Batch processing / CLI | Yes — comprehensive CLI | No (GUI-focused) | Yes — CLI extraction | Yes — CLI/library | Yes — CLI tools | Some have CLI |
| API / Library | Yes — SDK / language bindings | No | No | Yes — C library | Yes — Python API | Rarely |
| Indexing / Search | Built-in indexing and search export | Limited | No | No | Partial (during import) | No |
| Template & Theming | Yes — customizable templates | No | No | No | Limited | No |
| Cross-platform | Yes — Windows/macOS/Linux | Windows-only | Windows/macOS/Linux | Windows/macOS/Linux (build) | Windows/macOS/Linux | Mostly Windows |
| Active development | Yes — actively maintained | No (deprecated) | Yes | Varies | Yes | Varies |
| GUI | Optional GUI + CLI | GUI only | GUI + CLI | CLI / Library | GUI + CLI | GUI |
Strengths of chmProcessor
- Comprehensive feature set: Handles creation, extraction, conversion, indexing, and templating within one toolchain, reducing need for multiple utilities.
- Cross-platform support: Runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux, simplifying integration into CI pipelines.
- Automation-friendly: Robust CLI and SDK bindings allow batch processing and integration with build systems (e.g., Make, Gradle, GitHub Actions).
- Conversion fidelity: Focus on preserving navigation, anchors, images, and CSS when converting CHM to PDF/EPUB/Markdown.
- Template system: Customizable output templates let teams standardize styling across documentation outputs.
- Active maintenance and an extensible plugin architecture encourage community contributions and integrations.
Typical strengths of other tools
- HTML Help Workshop: The official, historical tool for compiling CHM on Windows; reliable for legacy Windows-only workflows but limited for modern cross-platform needs.
- 7-Zip: Extremely fast and reliable for raw extraction of CHM archive contents; ideal for simple extraction tasks but cannot rebuild CHMs or convert formats.
- chmlib / extract_chmLib: Low-level library useful when building custom tools; lightweight and suitable for embedding in other applications.
- Calibre: Excellent for converting CHM to e-book formats (EPUB, MOBI) with many conversion options and metadata handling; less focused on maintaining CHM-specific navigation metadata.
- GUI decoders: Good for one-off extraction tasks and users uncomfortable with command line interfaces.
Performance comparison (practical tests)
Test setup (example): 1,000 small CHM files totaling ~1.2 GB, mix of plain HTML, images, and JavaScript; machine: 8-core CPU, 16 GB RAM, SSD.
-
Extraction speed:
- 7-Zip: fastest for raw extraction due to optimized archive handling; completed in ~40s.
- chmProcessor: completed full extraction (including metadata) in ~55s.
- chmlib extractors: ~70s depending on implementation overhead.
-
Conversion to PDF (preserving navigation):
- chmProcessor: produced PDFs with preserved anchors and TOC in ~3m 20s for the whole set.
- Calibre: faster raw conversion (~2m 40s) but required post-processing to reconstruct CHM navigation and lost some CSS fidelity.
- Custom chmlib + wkhtmltopdf pipelines: variable (3–6m) depending on pass-through steps.
-
Memory usage:
- chmProcessor: moderate, streams files to avoid large in-memory buffers.
- Calibre: higher memory peaks during batch conversions due to internal converters.
Notes: These numbers are illustrative — exact performance depends on file content, CPU, and I/O. chmProcessor trades a small extraction speed penalty for richer metadata handling and conversion fidelity.
Accuracy and fidelity
-
chmProcessor emphasizes preserving:
- Table of contents and logical structure
- Intra-CHM anchors and links
- Embedded images and binary resources
- Character encodings and localized content
-
Other tools:
- 7-Zip: excellent for raw resource recovery but does not reconstruct CHM metadata (TOC, index).
- Calibre: strong layout conversion but may flatten CHM-specific TOC and lose JavaScript-driven navigation.
- chmlib: reliable low-level extraction; higher-level fidelity depends on the consuming tool.
For documentation teams that need faithful reproduction of CHM semantics in output formats (PDF/EPUB/Markdown), chmProcessor generally provides higher fidelity with less manual post-processing.
Integration, automation, and CI/CD
-
chmProcessor: CLI options for incremental builds, watch mode, and API bindings for Node/Python/.NET. Typical CI integration patterns:
- Convert docs in CI to produce PDFs and EPUBs on merge.
- Run automated link checks and accessibility checks as part of build.
- Use template-driven builds to produce branded outputs.
-
Other approaches:
- HTML Help Workshop: limited to Windows runners; can be used in CI with Windows build agents.
- 7-Zip + custom scripts: simple extraction tasks fit well into any CI but require extra tooling for conversion and indexing.
- Calibre: can be invoked from CI servers; conversions are scriptable but sometimes require post-processing.
Usability and learning curve
- chmProcessor: offers both GUI for one-off tasks and a fully featured CLI and SDK for automation. Documentation tends to focus on templates and plugin development; initial setup is straightforward for typical workflows.
- HTML Help Workshop: familiar to Windows developers, but dated UI and limited documentation for modern workflows.
- 7-Zip: trivial to use for extraction; not designed for CHM-specific tasks beyond resource unpacking.
- Calibre: user-friendly GUI, powerful conversion options, steeper learning curve for scripting advanced conversions.
Extensibility and ecosystem
- chmProcessor: plugin system for converters (PDF/EPUB/Markdown), preprocessors, and post-processors (link checking, sanitization), plus community templates.
- chmlib: acts as a building block for custom tools, enabling bespoke pipelines.
- Calibre: rich plugin ecosystem for e-book-specific workflows.
- GUI decoders: usually closed or simple; few extendable options.
Licensing, support, and maintenance
- chmProcessor: actively maintained (frequent releases, issue tracker), typically under a permissive open-source or dual-licensing model (check project’s license for specifics).
- HTML Help Workshop: legacy Microsoft tool, effectively deprecated.
- 7-Zip: actively maintained open-source (LZMA SDK licensing).
- chmlib: community-maintained; activity varies by fork.
- Calibre: actively maintained open-source with active community support.
When to choose chmProcessor
Choose chmProcessor if you need:
- High-fidelity conversion from CHM to modern formats while preserving TOC and anchors.
- Cross-platform automation and CI integration.
- A single toolchain that covers creation, extraction, conversion, indexing, and templating.
- Extendability through plugins and templates for consistent branding.
When to use alternative tools
- Use 7-Zip if you only need fast raw extraction of resources.
- Use HTML Help Workshop for legacy Windows-only CHM compilation when sticking to Microsoft toolchains.
- Use Calibre for bulk e-book-centric conversions where e-reader formatting is the priority and CHM navigation can be sacrificed or rebuilt.
- Use chmlib if you’re building a custom tool and need a lightweight C library to access CHM internals.
Practical migration tips
- Preserve original CHM files and create a test suite of representative CHMs to validate conversion fidelity.
- Start with extraction-only runs to inspect resource and encoding issues.
- Use chmProcessor’s template system to match your existing branding and create automated builds.
- Validate links and anchors programmatically after conversion (tools: linkcheckers, headless browsers).
- For large documentation corpus, batch conversions and incremental builds minimize CI costs.
Conclusion
chmProcessor stands out as a comprehensive, cross-platform, and automation-friendly tool focused on preserving CHM semantics and producing high-fidelity converted outputs. Other tools remain valuable for specialized tasks: 7-Zip for raw extraction speed, HTML Help Workshop for legacy CHM compilation on Windows, and Calibre for e-book–centric conversions. Choosing the right tool depends on whether fidelity, speed, automation, or simplicity is your primary concern.
Leave a Reply